Institute for Scientific Exchange, Inc.
Presents:
|
ETS-2006 6th International
Conference on Early Toxicity Screening The Edgewater Hotel, |
Featuring experts from the following
institutions: The ADMET Group LLC; Arena Pharmaceuticals; AstraZeneca; Biotrin
International; CeeTox, Inc.; Charles River Laboratories Preclinical Sciences;
CZ Technologies, LLC; HemoGenix, Inc.; Hoffmann-La Roche Inc.; Institute for In
Vitro Sciences, Inc.; Invitrogen Corporation; Merck Research Laboratories;
Multi Channel Systems MCS GmbH; NIEHS; Novartis Institutes for Biomedical
Research; Promega Corp.; Seattle Genetics, Inc.; Unilever R&D; University
of Washington
PARTICIPATING EXHIBITORS:
Planning
Committee and Session Chairs:
Albert P. Li,
The ADMET Group, LLC.
Weichao Chen, Arena
Pharmaceuticals
Joseph Tomaszewski,
NIH
Claudia
McGinnis, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research
Jim McKim,
CeeTox, Inc.
Session 1:
Early Prediction of Organ-Specific Toxicity
Chair: Claudia McGinnis
The Use of Primary Human Cells in
Early Toxicology Screening for Prediction of Livertoxicity and Hematopoietic Liabilities
(Claudia McGinnis, Maria Eckert, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research; Cambridge MA) Side effects such as livertoxicity and bone marrow
suppression cause serious limitations in the development of new drugs. Early
toxicology screening characterizes early drug candidates for potential
liabilities and supports the lead optimization process towards a cleaner
compound profile. Two cell-based, high-throughput luminescence assays for the
detection of liver- and bone marrow toxicity were developed using primary human
cells, cryopreserved human hepatocytes and fresh human bone marrow. In vitro
toxic effects of test compounds were tested in a microplate format and cell
viability determined by quantitation of cellular ATP. Data will be presented on
the validation of these assays with a set of marketed drugs and Novartis
compounds. The assays are implemented as a global, routine service for lead
finding and optimization phases.
In Silico Models for the Prediction of Dose‑Dependent Human Hepatotoxicity (Ailan Cheng, CZ Technologies, LLC.
A
Microarray-based Approach to Understanding Drug Bioactivation in Rodent Liver (Greg Slatter
and Wei Tang, Rosetta Inpharmatics LLC (A subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc.)
QT Prolongation: A Roche Perspective on Predictive Assays (Heather Guthrie, Hoffmann-La
Roche Inc.;
New Cell Models &
Assays in Cardiac Safety Profiling (Thomas Meyer,
Multi Channel Systems MCS GmbH; Sartipy, Peter Cellartis SA; Guenther,
Elke Natural and Medical Sciences Institute at the Tuebingen University;
Reutlingen, GERMANY) The early screening for cardiotoxic side effects of
new medical entities currently requires to compromise between data quality and
throughput. Whereas the gold standard is patch clamp of primary ventricular
cardiomyocytes of suitable species, HTS suitable assays use cell lines stably
expressing the hERG channels for electrophysiological and
non-electrophysiological assays. The limitations of these assays have been
discussed extensively previously. With the combination of the QT-Screen system
(Multi Channel Systems, Reutlingen, Germany)with cardiomyocyte aggregations
differentiated from human embryonic stem cells (Cellartis SA, Gothenburg,
Sweden), a novel assay is going to overcome the species limitation and provide
a functional electrophysiological readout. First results do look promising;
however a thorough evaluation regarding the
development status of the cells, ion
channel expression pattern and reproducibility is still required.
Predictive In Vitro
Hemotoxicology and the Concept of In
Vitro Comparative Toxicity, Cross-Platform Technology (Ivan N. Rich, HemoGenix, Inc.;
Colorado Springs, CO) The
HALO Predictive Hemotoxicology Platform (PHP), which can detect and measure up
to 14 lympho-hematopoietic cells populations from 5 species simultaneously, has
been described at previous ETS meetings. The HALO Platform is now joined by 2
new in vitro toxicity platforms,
LUMENESC and STEMTox. LUMENESC detects toxicity on mesenchymal stem cells and
their differentiating elements while STEMTox detects toxicity in proliferating
cells from numerous other organs and tissues. The same luminescence detection
system is common to all 3 platforms, but together can be used to compare
toxicity in over 50 different cell types derived from 14 different human cell
systems.
Medium Throughput Automated In
Vitro and Ex Vivo Assays for Frontloading
Bone Marrow Toxicity Screening (Franηois
Pognan,
AstraZeneca, Global
Safety Assessment,
Cheshire UK) Bone marrow toxicity is a cause of late stage compound attrition in the
pharmaceutical industry. This is
typically assessed during the pre-Candidate Drug phase. The objective of
bone marrow early screening in the discovery phase is to identify
chemistry-associated liabilities and to frontload risk assessment. To this
end, a screening tiered approach has been developed that enables a large number
of compounds to be evaluated around early 'Lead Optimisation' phase.
Various cell lines representative of broad bone marrow lineages are used as
pre-assessment of chemicals series (Tier 1). Then, a new and
automated assay using primary bone marrow cells following a similar
principle to the Colony Forming Unit (CFU) assay (Tier 2), is run to
qualify and confirm tier 1 findings. This may also trigger in vivo study frontloading
(Tier 3). This tiered approach allows weeding out early on compounds with
chemistry-related bone marrow toxicity from the research project pipelines.
Skeletal Muscle: A Target for Toxicity
by Marketed and Investigational Drugs (Russell Westwood,
Session II:
Novel Technologies for Early Toxicity Screening
Chair: Albert P. Li
Microfluidic (Lab-on-a-chip) Screening Technologies (Albert Folch, University of Washington, Seattle, WA) Microtechnology offers the attractive
possibility of modulating the microenvironment of single cells and, for the
same price, obtain data at high throughput for a small cost. Microfluidic or Lab on a Chip devices, in
particular, promise to play a key role for several reasons: 1) the dimensions
of microchannels can be comparable to or smaller than a single cell; 2) the unique physicochemical behavior of
liquids confined to microenvironments enables new strategies for delivering
compounds to cells on a subcellular level;
3) the devices consume small quantities of precious/hazardous reagents
(thus reducing cost of operation/disposal);
and 4) they can be mass-produced in low-cost, portable units. Not surprisingly, in recent years there has
been an eruption of microfluidic implementations of a variety of traditional
bioanalysis techniques. I will review the latest efforts of our laboratory in
the development of cell-based microdevices for cell biology studies, such as
neuromuscular synaptogenesis, axon guidance, and chemotaxis.
Integrated Discrete Co-culture Technologies (Organ(s)-on-a-Chip) for
Toxicity Screening (Albert P. Li, The
ADMET Group LLC; Rockville, MD) A novel technology has been developed in our
laboratory to allow the co-culturing of multiple cell types as
physically-separated (discrete) cultures while being interconnected (integrated)
by an overlying medium, a technology termed IDC Integrated Discrete
Co-culture. Using this technology, the
toxic potential of an agent towards multiple cell types can be evaluated under
virtually identical conditions. The IDC
can be applied to evaluate the toxic potential of an agent towards multiple
organs (Organs-on-a-Chip), or multiple cells of the same organ
(Organ-on-a-chip). Data of both
applications will be shown to demonstrate the utility of this novel technology
which has the potential to refine, replace, and reduce the use of animals in
research. The use of human cells in the
IDC will allow the assessment of human toxicity either for multiple key cell
types of a single organ (e.g. evaluation of pulmonary toxicity via the
co-culturing of large airway epithelium, small airway epithelium, pulmonary
microvascular endothelial cells), or multiple organs (e.g. hepatocytes (liver);
kidney (proximal tubule epithelial cells; CNS (astrocytes); vascular endothelium
(aorta endothelial cells; and lung (small airway epithelial cells).
Development of an Early Toxicity Screening Cascade for the Assessment of
the Activity of Antibody-Drug Conjugates (May
Sutherland,
5:00
Histologically Defined Biomarkers in Drug Development (Martin Shaw, Biotrin International;
END OF DAY
Session 3:
Application of Cell-lines in
Toxicity Screening
Chair: Jim McKim
Improving Drug Candidate Selection by Incorporating In Vitro Toxicity
Data into the Discovery Process (Jim
McKim, CeeTox, Inc.; Kalamazoo, MI) Identifying potential adverse properties of new chemical
entities early in the discovery process enhances the candidate selection
process and increases the probability of success in preclinical and clinical
safety studies. This approach requires a robust array of cell-based
screening paradigms that can be tiered in a way that enables researchers to
fine tune the discovery funnel for choosing leads that have been optimized for
both the desired attributes of a drug and for safety. A systems biology
approach combined with multiple endpoint analysis, dose-response, and in vivo
validation can provide an excellent bridge between the in vitro screening
environment and expected in vivo effects. This presentation will focus on a
tiered approach to in vitro screening and demonstrate the in vivo predictive
value of the data obtained.
Comparison of In Vitro Assays
of Cellular Toxicity in the Human Hepatic Cell Line HepG2 (Silvia Miret, Unilever R&D;
Validation & Regulatory Acceptance of In Vitro Toxicity/Potency
Assays ((Hans
Raabe, Institute for In
Vitro Sciences, Inc.;
Session 4:
General Early Toxicity Screening Approaches
Chair: Weichao Chen
Bioluminescent Approaches
For In Vitro ADME/Tox (James J. Cali,
Promega Corp.;
12:00
The Role of Early In Vivo Toxicity Screening in Drug Safety
Evaluation (Jessica E. Sutherland,
Charles River Laboratories Preclinical Services; Worcester, MA) A properly designed toxicity screening program (including in
vivo studies) can be used to optimize lead compounds in attempt to identify
which should move from discovery into development. Early in vivo toxicity screening is also
useful during pilot and dose range-finding studies or when formulation decisions
are needed. Selection of the proper animal model(s), sample size, route
of administration, and toxicological endpoints is vital to the success of these
early nonclinical assays.
2:10
Managing Oxidative Bioactivation in
Drug Discovery (Wei Tang, Merck Research
Laboratories,
Detection and Quantification of Neurotoxic Ab42 Aggregates (Mary Michael
Brodey, BioSource Cytokines & Signaling; Invitrogen Corporation
3:10
Strategies to Eliminate Toxicity with Structural Modification Approaches in Drug Discovery (Weichao Chen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, San Diego, CA) Toxicity of drug candidates is one of the major problems facing the pharmaceutical industry. Hepatotoxicity, cardiotoxicity and drug-drug interaction related toxicities are the three major reasons for the failure of drug candidates. Early toxicity screening could weed out compounds with potential toxicity, and structure activity relationship for toxicity could be established with screening results. Structural modification approaches can be utilized to avoid potential toxicity of drug candidates. Case studies including both successes and failures in drug discovery will be presented.
3:50
A New Approach to Toxicity Testing at the NTP: High Throughput
Screening (Kristine L. Witt, NIEHS;
4:40
END OF CONFERENCE
About the Institute
for Scientific Exchange
The mission of The Institute for Scientific
Exchange, Inc. is to advance science via
communication (i. e. symposia, training courses, publications). The events held by the Institute are highly
selective, timely, and of the highest professional caliber. One major goal of the Institute, as
exemplified by this symposium, is to foster communication among industrial,
regulatory, and academic practitioners. Please visit our web site at www.isciencex.com.
POSTER PRESENTATIONS:
Poster Presentations are always encouraged. Please submit your
poster abstract for approval by the organizing board by May 30th. Poster size should be no larger than 3 feet
high by 7 feet long. Abstracts of
posters will be included in the participant binder and in the ISE website. There is no formal poster presentation scheduled. All posters will remain displayed throughout
the conference. Please be prepared to
display your poster during registration on Wednesday, June 21st or
before the first session begins on Thursday, June 22nd. Poster presenters will have ample time for
discussion during breaks and the Panel discussions. Submit posters abstracts
for approval to Nola Mahaney, VP, Operations; ISE, Inc.; 5707 Calverton Street,
Suite 2C; Baltimore, MD 21228 or fax at (410) 869-9560 or email file attachment
to nola@isciencex.com. Approved poster presenters are responsible
for completing a conference attendance registration form and payment of fee (visit
www.isciencex.com/register.htm) and for the shipping
of the poster itself. Please contact
Nola Mahaney for any questions or concerns.
Please refer to Travel Information for hotel address and shipping
information.
PARTICIPATING EXHIBITORS:
CeeTox
Hotel Information:
The
Edgewater Hotel, 2411
Alaskan Way, Pier 67
Seattle, Washington (WA) 98121 Hotel Direct (Tel) 206.728.7000 (Fax) 206.419.4119 Reservations
800.624.0670 www.edgewaterhotel.com
http://www.edgewaterhotel.com/default.aspx?pageid=reservation
Please ask for DDI-2006 block for
ISE, Inc.
Exhibitors: US$2000.00
(ETS-2006) ________
US$2000.00(DDI-2006) ________
US$3000.00
(both events) ______
Contact Nola Mahaney for
Exhibitor or Sponsorship Opportunities at nola@isciencex.com,
or phone (410) 869-9166); or visit www.isciencex.com/exhibitors
Academic/Government participants will receive a 50%
discount.
PLEASE NOTE WHICH PROGRAM YOU WISH TO ATTEND IF REGISTERING FOR MULTIPLE PROGRAMS.
|
Event(s)
(check all events registered) |
Individual Course/Conference
- $ (Check if only registering for one single event) |
Special Combination
Discounts: Check one of the
combinations if registering for more than one event Early
Registration Discounts Available (see below) |
|
Tutorial 1 06/19/2006 |
US $400.00 ______ |
Both Tutorials: US$800.00 ________ 1 Tutorial and 1
Conference: US $1700.00 _______ |
|
Tutorial 2 06/19/2006 |
US $400.00 ______
|
2 Tutorials and 1
Conference: US$2000.00 __________ Both Conferences: US $2500.00 __________ |
|
DDI-2006 06/20-06/21/2006 |